I mean, the character is canonically transgender, and those look identical to early-hrt breast growth, so yeah. Small breasts are still breasts.
Except there's plenty of art of guys like that that are still intended to be viewed as male. Bridget is no exception; plenty of art of her as male was made even after she was revealed to be transgender (and she never physically transitioned as far as I know). I don't know why they're sometimes drawn to look like breasts while the character is meant to be male at the same time, but that's just how it is. Unless the artist said Bridget in this image has physically transitioned, we don't have any reason to assume that is the case. There just isn't enough evidence to warrant changing the tags.
Except there's plenty of art of guys like that that are still intended to be viewed as male. Bridget is no exception; plenty of art of her as male was made even after she was revealed to be transgender (and she never physically transitioned as far as I know). I don't know why they're sometimes drawn to look like breasts while the character is meant to be male at the same time, but that's just how it is. Unless the artist said Bridget in this image has physically transitioned, we don't have any reason to assume that is the case. There just isn't enough evidence to warrant changing the tags.
I believe it was determined that artist intent doesn't matter when tagging this character on this site. It goes by a "looks not lore" basis. Though for what it is worth, I believe this artist has used she/her in the past for this character. To me this character has clearly female secondary sexual characteristics and looks like a girl with a dick, not a guy. I know there's a lot of difficulty tagging a character such as this, who was previously a femboy and then developed into a trans woman, but I believe fem tags are appropriate for any drawing of bridget with breasts.
I believe it was determined that artist intent doesn't matter when tagging this character on this site. It goes by a "looks not lore" basis. Though for what it is worth, I believe this artist has used she/her in the past for this character.
Correct, the artist's intent would not be enough. My point was that it didn't seem to meet even that standard and it looks no different than any other "trap" character with a puffy chest.
To me this character has clearly female secondary sexual characteristics and looks like a girl with a dick, not a guy. I know there's a lot of difficulty tagging a character such as this, who was previously a femboy and then developed into a trans woman, but I believe fem tags are appropriate for any drawing of bridget with breasts.
Would you say the same for Otori Tan, who's chest often looks just as developed? Should we be switching those to genderswap (mtf) too, even knowing that puffy chests is part of the fetish? Can you reliably tell the difference between actual breasts and puffy chests? If so, would trap fans agree with your categorization?
I see Oda Nobunaga's Maou Avenger persona is tagged here, but not in the labeled version of this image. I think someone mistook Ms Crane for the Demon King.
She is crazy and hot as hell you mean yes she is crazy but hot is what you should say would have been better because yes she is definitely crazy but she's also definitely hot
Translation already done on Twitter for anytime who wants to have a crack at it. I'd do it myself, but last I checked, mobile users aren't allowed to create notes for really totally definitely legit trust me bro reasons that none are permitted to know.
can I please have that guns said Subaru who wants to shoot puck akemi homura said sure but give it back after so I can protect my girlfriend from his fucking cat
Leave a comment