Comments

Show 19 more comments
[hidden]

PSB said:
seems like they counted it as a motion required 1/60th of a second rather than 1/30th.

Well, 60 FPS is the speed Touhou games are meant to run at, thus, two frames would be 1/30th of a second.
Now we can safely calculate the speeds of all other movements in Touhou!

Date Uploader VR-Man Rating Questionable
Tags
g_(genesis1556) original annes_(g_(genesis1556)) arisa_(g_(genesis1556)) dein_(g_(genesis1556)) karutia_(g_(genesis1556)) leia_(g_(genesis1556)) lutian_(g_(genesis1556)) mia_(g_(genesis1556)) rara_(g_(genesis1556)) rio_(g_(genesis1556)) ryuuga_(g_(genesis1556)) tsubasa_ryuuji annotation_request commentary_request highres partially_annotated translated 1boy 2020 6+girls =_= abs ahoge antenna_hair arm_support arm_under_breasts arms_under_breasts artist_name ass back bathing black_hair blonde_hair blush breast_press breast_rest breasts brown_eyes choker cloud cloudy_sky collarbone colored_eyelashes convenient_censoring convenient_hair covering_breasts covering_privates crossed_arms crotch_grab dragon_boy dragon_claw dragon_girl dragon_horns dragon_tail fence flying_sweatdrops gem grass green_choker green_hair grey_hair groin hair_between_eyes hand_on_own_chest hands_on_own_hips hidden_mickey high_ponytail horns large_breasts long_hair looking_at_another mixed-sex_bathing monster_boy monster_girl multicolored_hair multiple_girls navel nose_blush nude nude_cover one_eye_closed onsen open_mouth outdoors partially_submerged pink_hair ponytail purple_hair purple_sky red_eyes red_hair rock rupee_(zelda) scar scar_across_eye scar_on_face shared_bathing short_hair sidelocks sign sitting sky smoking soaking_feet splashing star_(sky) starry_sky statue steam steam_censor streaked_hair sweatdrop symmetrical_docking tail towel tree two-tone_hair water waterfall wet when_you_see_it white_hair wooden_fence yellow_eyes
Show 2 more comments
[hidden]

Blank_User said in comment #2627549:

Which they won't be able to do if you don't add the chartags before removing character request. All five members are visible and should be tagged.

was a mistype, meant, wouldn't* since to me they seem barely visible in this image and it's hard to see what is on those photos without going to those other posts so I didn't believe their char tags are appropriate here.

[hidden]

fluffyfluffy said in comment #2627600:

was a mistype, meant, wouldn't* since to me they seem barely visible in this image and it's hard to see what is on those photos without going to those other posts so I didn't believe their char tags are appropriate here.

The only requirement for a chartag is that the character shows up in the image somewhere. It doesn't matter how prominent they are.

A user searching for a character would expect to find all posts containing that character. If they're barely visible, that gives the user incentive to look closer and find the character. We're not always going to have a full-size image where we can see the exact same thing but more clearly.

Conversely, if a user has the character blacklisted, they're not going to care that they only show up as a small background element.

[hidden]

Blank_User said in comment #2627626:

The only requirement for a chartag is that the character shows up in the image somewhere. It doesn't matter how prominent they are.

A user searching for a character would expect to find all posts containing that character. If they're barely visible, that gives the user incentive to look closer and find the character. We're not always going to have a full-size image where we can see the exact same thing but more clearly.

Conversely, if a user has the character blacklisted, they're not going to care that they only show up as a small background element.

No that's stupid. A user searching the character isn't going to want to see a post where they appear as 3 pixels in the tiniest inset imaginable. If it were more prominent sure, but this isn't that.

[hidden]

ANON_TOKYO said in comment #2627992:

No that's stupid. A user searching the character isn't going to want to see a post where they appear as 3 pixels in the tiniest inset imaginable. If it were more prominent sure, but this isn't that.

I have literally never seen anything about deliberately leaving identifiable characters untagged if they're not prominent in the image. Isn't the whole point of chartags to list all the identifiable characters in an image?

Look at your average absolutely everyone post. They tend to have every single character tagged (when it's not tagged as character request, at least) even if they have minimal detail. Mikasa from Azur Lane is tagged in post #11771054 despite being barely visible. I would even argue the Abydos girls in the left photo are more prominent than her. Sure, someone specifically looking for Mikasa (Azur Lane) pics probably wouldn't be interested in this, but these kind of posts are relatively rare and won't have a huge impact on searches. I would rather have a small, barely visible but still identifiable cameo tagged than risk missing it entirely in a search even if it looks like a false positive at first.

Even if prominence was a determining factor, then Nonomi should still be tagged at least. An inset one-fourth the height of my monitor is nowhere near "the tiniest inset imaginable."

Edit: In line with the above, I'm putting the Nonomi tag back on. I'd still argue everyone should be tagged, but the others are significantly blurrier and blocked by Hoshino's hand, so I'll leave those off for now and let someone else figure it out. But Nonomi in the right photo is as prominent as any background character that would normally get tagged, so I see no reason to leave her untagged.

If anyone disagrees, please bring it up in the forums or at least link to a previous forum discussion about this. As far as I can tell, this is standard practice, so if we're really not supposed to tag these, there needs to be some statement about it.

Updated by Blank User