We are so back! Read here about the downtime and security incident. Registered members can now search up to three tags at once!

Comments

[hidden]

sy137646 said in comment #2616688:

Please do not delete the ai-assisted tag.
topic #22285
Here's a comparison: https://slow.pics/c/3zu2Zm6O. There's a tiny circular gap around her head, her hair and face changes too much in some places but is unchanged in others (both her eyes are completely redrawn, except for half of her right eyelashes).

What you are posting here is not definitive proof. Unless you actually have proof they 100% use AI or the evidence is significantly overwhelming, both of which are not present in instances with this artist, you should not be adding this tag like this so willy nilly.

Updated by Raynare

[hidden]

Raynare said in comment #2620350:

What you are posting here is not definitive proof. Unless you actually have proof they 100% use AI or the evidence is significantly overwhelming, both of which are not present in instances with this artist, you should not be adding this tag like this so willy nilly.

I made a comparison GIF — even though it got compressed, given how different the details are between the two, I think this probably indicates AI assistance? The way the two images differ is pretty strange.

[hidden]

Raynare said in comment #2620350:

What you are posting here is not definitive proof. Unless you actually have proof they 100% use AI or the evidence is significantly overwhelming, both of which are not present in instances with this artist, you should not be adding this tag like this so willy nilly.

I went and compared the noise/artifacts between the two images. There's no way the mouth area should have such a huge difference in noise, and some of it changes inexplicably. It's just super weird.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HPAgFS2bQAAgBDR?format=jpg&name=900x900

[hidden]

nonamethanks said in comment #2621036:

All that shows is that they used a different layer for the face. ai-assisted required concrete proof, and "super weird" is not a concrete proof.

Let me explain in detail why the abnormal color noise around the mouth is so strange. In traditional digital painting, brushes don't introduce a massive amount of noise into the colors—as seen in the left image of the first column, skin is painted as a solid color block. In AI images, however, even flat color blocks contain noise (see the left image of the third column). The issue is that the mouth in the right image of the first column exhibits the exact same noise clustering as the mouth after local inpainting in the right image of the third column. This is simply inexplicable.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HPCHMSAaQAA98a1?format=jpg&name=medium

[hidden]

What she's singing appears to be a Macross Frontier song known as Lion. The lyrics at this point (2nd paragraph) are pretty much just straight up "I want to survive" and it seems Mystia wasn't expecting it to be quite so context-sensitive.

I'll leave it up to someone more experienced whether to translate it directly or not, but I'll note that an excellent way to localise the joke might be to use I Will Survive instead. They even both have a repeated line at an iconic part of the song.