We are so back! Read here about the downtime and security incident. Registered members can now search up to three tags at once!

Comments

Show 1 more comment
[hidden]

123kid said in comment #2631108:

I don‘t know about this video but the animator used anna_anon‘s models before in other videos and credited them so they got added on those here too.

More specifically it's Koikatsu Scene data created by anna anon as mentioned on the WIP Tweet of this post.

SD:AnnaAnon

https://x.com/R18_MMD_game/status/2099490929518543315

These are shared as PNG files or "Scene Cards"which contain everything like character positions, posing, lighting, animation, camera settings and other stuff. Other users can then drop in their own models using Character Cards.

If you search Twitter for anna anon scene you'll come across several familiar animations.

[hidden]

GabrielWB said in comment #2631173:

More specifically it's Koikatsu Scene data created by anna anon as mentioned on the WIP Tweet of this post.

https://x.com/R18_MMD_game/status/2099490929518543315

These are shared as PNG files or "Scene Cards"which contain everything like character positions, posing, lighting, animation, camera settings and other stuff. Other users can then drop in their own models using Character Cards.

If you search Twitter for anna anon scene you'll come across several familiar animations.

Would the animations fall under derivative_work?

[hidden]

Meddy-san said in comment #2631302:

Would the animations fall under derivative_work?

I think so yeah, the animation is created by one party and then used as a base by someone else. If someone uses a drawing from someone else it also gets tagged as such. Tags and references added to the relevant posts. Not going to add parent/child relationships though because that gets messy very fast.

Derivative work:

An error occurred while loading the video.

0:00 / 0:01
  • Space Play/Pause
  • m Mute
  • ↑ ↓ Volume
  • ← → Seek
  • 0-9 Seek to 0-90%
  • < > Change speed
Show 2 more comments
[hidden]

Rathurue said in comment #2631988:

By danbooru standards? Non-visible signs of genitals or gender-specific secondary attributes should warrant it 1other or androgynous if the exact character was not known. This is Bridget (Guilty Gear).

not how it works either. 1other applies when either a. the character is completely obscured such that it's impossible to figure out their gender, or b. the character is canonically confirmed to be of indeterminate gender and there are no sex characteristics visible.

ergo, if this picture was an original character removed from all context, it would be 1girl. the only reason it's not is because character counters are canon tags.

[hidden]

CrystalLeaf said in comment #2632061:

I don' think that word means what you think it means.

where's the misunderstanding? bridget's transness is not lost on me but the matter of the fact is that our tagging consensus says that unless she walks into frame, turns to the camera and says "by the way, i got sex reassignment surgery yesterday", she's 1boy. it's just about the stupidest thing ever but hey, i'm just here to explain how it works.