By danbooru standards? Non-visible signs of genitals or gender-specific secondary attributes should warrant it 1other or androgynous if the exact character was not known. This is Bridget (Guilty Gear).
By danbooru standards? Non-visible signs of genitals or gender-specific secondary attributes should warrant it 1other or androgynous if the exact character was not known. This is Bridget (Guilty Gear).
not how it works either. 1other applies when either a. the character is completely obscured such that it's impossible to figure out their gender, or b. the character is canonically confirmed to be of indeterminate gender and there are no sex characteristics visible.
ergo, if this picture was an original character removed from all context, it would be 1girl. the only reason it's not is because character counters are canon tags.
I don' think that word means what you think it means.
where's the misunderstanding? bridget's transness is not lost on me but the matter of the fact is that our tagging consensus says that unless she walks into frame, turns to the camera and says "by the way, i got sex reassignment surgery yesterday", she's 1boy. it's just about the stupidest thing ever but hey, i'm just here to explain how it works.
Leave a comment