I have a feeling Hermione is losing her shit right about now.
Incineration said:
only the ones in the UK suffer directly from it.
Okay, how exactly do they "suffer" directly from living in the same country as the big bad terf? I doubt they have to so much as say good morning to her on an everyday basis.
Incineration said:
If hypocrisy could hurt...
I mean, I was trying just a bit to accommodate the poor mods after everything I've put them through before (though I will insist it takes two to tango), but here we go: Promoting trans stuff to children in schools, having people fined and put in prison for not agreeing with trans people is obviously, objectively far more provocative than anything YaroslavGh and I have said on this site.
Updated by AlsoSprachOdin
AlsoSprachOdin said in comment #2636328:
Okay, how exactly do they "suffer" directly from living in the same country as the big bad terf?
Do you ever think before you subject others to your inane bullshit? She is funding anti-trans groups with the goal of undoing any progress towards improving trans rights, a noteworthy case being in 2024 with For Women Scotland who managed to get the recognition of trans women as women by law revoked.
The worst part is that any ant-trans laws are actively harming cis women as well because people can use legalized transphobia as a defense for harassment. And of course it puts children at an even greater risk, regardless of gender identity, as seen with the Texas Women's Privacy Act.
And there is no such thing as "promoting" trans stuff to children. It's eduction with the explicit goal of avoiding psychological damage common in trans people by letting them actually know that they aren't a unique case who needs to pretend to be something they're not.
And I can't state this enough but apparently I need to: gender identity isn't a choice, you're born with it, and no amount of brainwashing by transphobes will change a child's gender identity, neither will any amount of gender education turn a cis child trans.
Incineration said in comment #2636332:
undoing any progress towards improving trans rights [...] managed to get the recognition of trans women as women by law revoked.
If trans people are allowed to hold beliefs contrary to other people's, others should be allowed their own beliefs contrary to those of trans people. This revocation is an improvement of everyone else's right to disagree (as opposed to being arrested, prosecuted and punished). To think you have a right to not be disagreed with is incredibly self-entitled, and anyone who wants people punished for disagreeing with them is a bully. And as far as suffering goes I just don't think it's that bad.
Incineration said in comment #2636332:
ant-trans laws
Which ones? A revocation is not a law. Is it?
Incineration said in comment #2636332:
It's eduction with the explicit goal
Potahto. I could talk about a teacher pushing the exact opposite ideas with the the exact same phrasing, and I know if a teacher did that you'd want that to stop too. The "transphobic" position is simply that both sides leave the children alone, but I don't expect you're willing to treat others as you wish to be treated.
Incineration said in comment #2636332:
neither will any amount of gender education turn a cis child trans.
And yet we have plenty of examples of de-transition, of people who grew up to deeply regret having been convinced they were trans as children, and having had trans therapy and surgery. This didn't use to be a problem, so clearly, people can be made to get their gender identity wrong.
Updated by AlsoSprachOdin
AlsoSprachOdin said in comment #2636366:
Potahto. I could talk about a teacher pushing the exact opposite ideas with the the exact same phrasing, and I know if a teacher did that you'd want that to stop too. The "transphobic" position is simply that both sides leave the children alone, but I don't expect you're willing to treat others as you wish to be treated.
Not teaching about gender-identity is the opposite
approach to teaching about it. How do want to stop "not teaching about something" if a teacher did that?
And no, you don't get to pretend its just about leaving children alone. If it was, then there wouldn't be so much effort and lobbying by people like Rowling to make the life of Trans-people harder who already made their choice and are fine with it.
And yet we have plenty of examples of de-transition, of people who grew up to deeply regret having been convinced they were trans as children, and having had trans therapy and surgery. This didn't use to be a problem, so clearly, people can be made to get their gender identity wrong.
It didn't feel like a problem because there was less data available and it wasn't talked much about in the public discourse. Doesn't mean people are more likely to regret the therapy these days.
Saiko said in comment #2636495:
Not teaching about gender-identity is the opposite approach to teaching about it.
Do you REALLY want to argue the semantics of whether 0 or -1 is the "real" opposite of 1? It just seems like getting off topic, and the actual argument of equally not propagandizing to children is being ignored.
Saiko said:
How do want to stop "not teaching about something" if a teacher did that?
Please, read your own reply before posting it, it is unclear what you mean by this.
Saiko said:
so much effort and lobbying by people like Rowling to make the life of Trans-people harder
That's very vague and doesn't tell me much about the hardship Rowling allegedly inflicts on any children, but my strong impression is that if the children were just left alone they wouldn't become trans in the first place. Because that's how it used to be.
Saiko said in comment #2636495:
It didn't feel like a problem because there was less data available and it wasn't talked much about in the public discourse.
Oh yeah, the old "there was plenty of gender dysphoria in the middle ages, we just don't have documentation". Great argument, except ACCHTUALLY there was NO gender dysphoria at all!
My source? Same as yours!
Seriously, it's just speculation. An absence of evidence is not evidence of lots of people wanting gender reassignment.
Updated by AlsoSprachOdin
The "original" under Copyright is the bottom-right character post #12307291 who is the artist's Dragon Quest X Heroine "Laura".
Context for some of the tags:
The artist titled this work "小兔子乖乖" (Good Little Bunny), which is the name of a Chinese nursery rhyme that teaches children not to let strangers into their home.
The nursery rhyme is about a little bunny left home alone while its mother runs errands. The mother warns the bunny not to open the door for anyone until she returns. A wolf, knowing the bunny is alone, attempts to trick its way inside to eat it by impersonating the mother rabbit.
Given the context and the visual details, there's some dark storytelling going on. The front door has been left open to the night, allowing fireflies into the home. Among the clothes strewn about is a yellow shirt featuring a bunny print on it, reinforcing the nursery rhyme's symbolism. You can also see three footprints: a shoe print, a bare human footprint, and a large paw print. Considering the artist used the interspecies mating tag on pixiv and there's mystery goop everywhere, it appears the intruder arrived as a human, removed their clothes, transformed into a werewolf, and..."ate" the "bunny" 
Updated by kanase-sakurada
What kind of power would a man have to have to be compatible with her?
Healing would be agony, and some resistance in most cases means hard skin, not comfortable for her.
A barrier would not cut it too, bloke would have to have some form of dealing with acid juices that doesn't make his skin weird.
Filters said in comment #2597309:
What kind of power would a man have to have to be compatible with her?
Healing would be agony, and some resistance in most cases means hard skin, not comfortable for her.
A barrier would not cut it too, bloke would have to have some form of dealing with acid juices that doesn't make his skin weird.
I mean she has resistance to her own acids, so it's canon the ability does exist
Filters said in comment #2597309:
What kind of power would a man have to have to be compatible with her?
Healing would be agony, and some resistance in most cases means hard skin, not comfortable for her.
A barrier would not cut it too, bloke would have to have some form of dealing with acid juices that doesn't make his skin weird.
The easiest one would be base generation. A slightly more complicated one is nullifying ability like what one of the villains has.
Filters said in comment #2597309:
What kind of power would a man have to have to be compatible with her?
Healing would be agony, and some resistance in most cases means hard skin, not comfortable for her.
A barrier would not cut it too, bloke would have to have some form of dealing with acid juices that doesn't make his skin weird.
Her main ship is with Kirishima, who can harden his body which from what we knows, makes him more resistant
badfries said in comment #2597423:
I mean she has resistance to her own acids, so it's canon the ability does exist
CoffeeMilkDrinker said in comment #2635713:
She's a tiger and a bunny.
Just like my favorite anime!
iampasta said in comment #2636456:
How is this tagged as vore ?
So being swallowed doesn't count as vore in your definition, huh.
Blank_User said in comment #2636539:
Vore is a fetish. This is about as non-sexual as it gets (surprisingly for khyle.). I don't think the tag is appropriate for SFW images like this.
I just checked the tag and I already seen a massive amounts of non-sexual posts use it.
I feel like this tag could use a clean-up.
There's a tied up (nonsexual) tag to go with the bondage tag, I wonder if a person swallowed whole (nonsexual) should be made to distinguish it from the vore tag?

Leave a comment