Comments

Show 1 more comment
[hidden]

GreenButterfly said in comment #2636157:

How is this a pixel-perfect duplicate? If I download both images, strip away the metadata using exiftool -all= -api largefilesupport=1 -overwrite_original -progress -recurse image.png, the images end up with different size. MD5 hashes are also different.

Stripping metadata does not account for compression methods. If you run both images through oxipng with oxipng --strip all --force image.png you get the same md5 hash for both.

[hidden]

We had the upload page updated particularly to point out potential upload problems more clearly. When you're on the upload page of a pixel-perfect duplicate, there is a red label at the bottom and a warning notice below the post button that says "Exact duplicate of [post here]" along with a help page linked explaining what a pixel-perfect duplicate is.

The information is highlighted all there for you to help you avoid this and you still uploaded six of these, meaning you disregarded the warning which you could've asked about. We have a lot of people who intentionally do this exact thing - so I do apologise if that wasn't what you were actually doing and that you had somehow didn't catch that duplicates should try to be avoided. It really helps out to read help pages like help:upload before getting started.

Unless you're posting so fast that you don't have time to see the warning on the page, most people will catch the duplicate warning before posting, so posting them isn't really a matter of an accident but either doing it intentionally or not understanding that it should be avoided if possible.

Updated by WRS

[hidden]

FYI this is the algorithm for pixel hashes, TL:DR it normalizes the image's colorspace, channel count etc, then writes it out as a .pam file, and takes the MD5 for that. It's different for non-images, but in all cases it's written in a way where you can expect no false positives (barring accidental MD5 collissions but you have to be really unlucky for that).

[hidden]

There is a sense of loneliness in this...

A microwaved pre-made meal. Just her being all alone without even any family member to be around. And her expressionless face...

Makes me wonder what happened to her. Is her family simply too busy?

Though I do notice the little kicks as well. Perhaps there is a little sense of joy within to still be able to eat a warm meal.

I may be overthinking this @_@

[hidden]

Changing this to ai-generated - it's just way too sloppy to justify the assisted tag, in my opinion.
Melting hair, nonsensical deformation of breasts, whatever is going on with that girl in the background (she's almost standing on water), Elegg is an amputee and her bikini top and bottom are mismatched, trees are growing out of thin air. If someone else wants to pull out their electron microscope to look for signs of AI - feel free to.

Updated by MiiaBestLamia

[hidden]

wingdings said in comment #2631289:

i know i've said that nothing's for certain with this artist with the accusations of ai use in the past but christ, this is dire. did he just stop giving a fuck entirely or what?

Shexyo has 1'230 gooners still paying them for their slop, minimum spend is 5 bucks.

When you can make over 6k/month doing the bare minimum, why wouldn't you?