Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? shigureszku 345

Copyright

  • ? wuthering waves 59k

Character

  • ? suoming (wuthering waves) 418

General

  • ? 1girl 8.6M
  • ? ahoge 996k
  • ? black jacket 402k
  • ? chest tattoo 20k
  • ? closed mouth 2.0M
  • ? fingernails 282k
  • ? hair ornament 2.1M
  • ? hand on own face 75k
  • ? jacket 1.5M
  • ? jacket on shoulders 34k
  • ? keyhole pupils 75
  • ? long fingernails 57k
  • ? long hair 6.3M
  • ? looking at viewer 5.0M
  • ? nail polish 352k
  • ? orange eyes 262k
  • ? red background 98k
  • ? red hair 752k
  • ? red nails 91k
  • ? shuangyaji 1.4k
  • ? smile 4.3M
  • ? solo 7.2M
  • ? symbol-shaped pupils 258k
  • ? tattoo 217k
  • ? upper body 1.2M

Meta

  • ? commentary 3.3M
  • ? duplicate 42k
  • ? ↳ pixel-perfect duplicate 26k
  • ? english commentary 1.4M
  • ? highres 8.4M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 3.1M

Information

  • ID: 12316692
  • Uploader: GreenButterfly »
  • Date: 21 days ago
  • Approver: Shibi »
  • Size: 12.6 MB .png (3200x3700) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/150192523 »
  • Rating: General
  • Score: 12
  • Favorites: 8
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
This post belongs to a parent and has 1 sibling (learn more) « hide
post #12270136
post #12268835
post #12316692
Resized to 26% of original (view original)
suoming (wuthering waves) drawn by shigureszku

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 鎖暝

    Twitter/X 🐦 @shigureszku

    • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    WRS
    21 days ago
    [hidden]

    @GreenButterfly Stop uploading pixel-perfect duplicates and setting them as the parent post to game approvals. Duplicates are not parent posts. If you're uploading them by accident, which I highly doubt, then you should be properly tagging them as duplicate as well.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    GreenButterfly
    21 days ago
    [hidden]

    How is this a pixel-perfect duplicate? If I download both images, strip away the metadata using exiftool -all= -api largefilesupport=1 -overwrite_original -progress -recurse image.png, the images end up with different size. MD5 hashes are also different.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    WRS
    21 days ago
    [hidden]

    Pixel-perfect duplicate is about the pixel hash not the MD5, meaning, when the pixels of the image are hashed together, they are the exact same. Metadata has no relevance here - if the upload page says it's a pixel-perfect duplicate, it means it's exactly identical to an existing image. Read the wiki for more information.

    https://danbooru.donmai.us/media_assets?search[pixel_hash]=8d44cded249096a6f0e8866cc51415c1

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    richp2k
    21 days ago
    [hidden]

    GreenButterfly said in comment #2636157:

    How is this a pixel-perfect duplicate? If I download both images, strip away the metadata using exiftool -all= -api largefilesupport=1 -overwrite_original -progress -recurse image.png, the images end up with different size. MD5 hashes are also different.

    Stripping metadata does not account for compression methods. If you run both images through oxipng with oxipng --strip all --force image.png you get the same md5 hash for both.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    GreenButterfly
    21 days ago
    [hidden]

    I see. Thanks for the explanation. I "highly doubt" that I want to contribute to a website whose moderators immediately assume malice though. Have a nice day.

    -2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    WRS
    21 days ago
    [hidden]

    We had the upload page updated particularly to point out potential upload problems more clearly. When you're on the upload page of a pixel-perfect duplicate, there is a red label at the bottom and a warning notice below the post button that says "Exact duplicate of [post here]" along with a help page linked explaining what a pixel-perfect duplicate is.

    The information is highlighted all there for you to help you avoid this and you still uploaded six of these, meaning you disregarded the warning which you could've asked about. We have a lot of people who intentionally do this exact thing - so I do apologise if that wasn't what you were actually doing and that you had somehow didn't catch that duplicates should try to be avoided. It really helps out to read help pages like help:upload before getting started.

    Unless you're posting so fast that you don't have time to see the warning on the page, most people will catch the duplicate warning before posting, so posting them isn't really a matter of an accident but either doing it intentionally or not understanding that it should be avoided if possible.

    Updated by WRS 21 days ago

    3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    ANON TOKYO
    21 days ago
    [hidden]

    FYI this is the algorithm for pixel hashes, TL:DR it normalizes the image's colorspace, channel count etc, then writes it out as a .pam file, and takes the MD5 for that. It's different for non-images, but in all cases it's written in a way where you can expect no false positives (barring accidental MD5 collissions but you have to be really unlucky for that).

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /