When netorare is strongly suggested through visual cues, context, dialogue, or aftermath, but the criteria for the full netorare tag are not fully met.
Netorare requires the presence of the cheated-on character in some form (physical or otherwise, such as on the phone) or that they are mentioned at significant length in the image. Do not use netorare if only the artist's commentary mentions NTR and no signs are present in the image itself.
Use this tag instead when the situation is clearly intended as netorare (someone close to the protagonist being seduced/stolen away) but the cheated-on party is absent or only weakly referenced, and the implication relies on other elements such as:
A character in a relationship (e.g. wearing a wedding ring, having a partner mentioned in dialogue) engaging in sexual activity with a third party, with no appearance or strong presence of the partner.
Aftermath or contextual clues (disheveled appearance, used condoms, guilty expressions, text messages, etc.) that point to infidelity without the victim being shown.
Situations that are part of a larger netorare sequence but the individual image does not contain enough direct evidence for the main tag.
This is distinct from imminent netorare (the taking-away is about to happen) and before netorare (normal interaction prior to the event in a comic/sequence).
Not to be confused with ordinary cheating, which lacks the specific netorare framing of the partner being "stolen".
