@anonsama, what evidence is there that this is AI-generated (since you added the tag)? The artist doesn't claim it, and everything looks clean as far as I can tell. It's also rendering a very obscure character that there would be no training data for accurately (the green haired guy in the foreground).

Shinjidude said:

@anonsama, what evidence is there that this is AI-generated (since you added the tag)? The artist doesn't claim it, and everything looks clean as far as I can tell. It's also rendering a very obscure character that there would be no training data for accurately (the green haired guy in the foreground).

Initially, I thought that the background looked somewhat suspicious. I looked at some of the artist's other work and I kind of made a misjudgement based on a post that had a lot of the patterns that an AI would use but after looking at some of the other stuff again, I can say that I kind of made a rushed judgement on things. I apologize for that.

anonsama said in comment #2526322:

Initially, I thought that the background looked somewhat suspicious. I looked at some of the artist's other work and I kind of made a misjudgement based on a post that had a lot of the patterns that an AI would use but after looking at some of the other stuff again, I can say that I kind of made a rushed judgement on things. I apologize for that.

Oof, not fully owning up to your mistake by saying 'I kinda messed up' rather than just admitting plainly that you fucked up. It's people like you the reason why big companies like OpenAI are still able to run circles around you even today and legitimate art is accused of being generated. 🤣