We're going to need an obtrusive_watermark tag or something at this rate, considering the uptick in art I've noticed with this nonsense. There's already adversarial_noise, which it looks like this image also has.

I get what they're trying to do, but I genuinely don't think the people scraping art en masse care even slightly about these messages. All it really does, IMO, is ruin the image by being incredibly distracting.

slow.motion.shadow said:

We're going to need an obtrusive_watermark tag or something at this rate, considering the uptick in art I've noticed with this nonsense. There's already adversarial_noise, which it looks like this image also has.

I get what they're trying to do, but I genuinely don't think the people scraping art en masse care even slightly about these messages. All it really does, IMO, is ruin the image by being incredibly distracting.

Whoops, forgot adversarial noise, it's indeed present.

A problem with classifying "obtrusiveness" is that some people (figuratively or literally) lose their shit at even a tiny weibo watermark on a gigantic pic, and others don't mind unless it literally covers the entire image multiple times over. It just varies a lot.