I think the neck is supposed to be covered by her hair, but it doesn't entirely match up since her collarbone is tilted towards us, and the neck would have to be I think closer to the right shoulder than maybe normal.
That said I like the art in general, the scenario is hot.
I came across this tweet from a porn artist. I imagine he's gotten enough responses, so I'll keep it anonymous.
"I wish people would stop criticizing porn based on realism We know cervix penetration isn't a thing, we know a belly bulge near the ribcage isn't a thing. We're not trying to give you an anatomy course. It's just exaggeration for the sake of porn. It ain't that deep."
It's tagged "bad anatomy", but judging from the upvotes, it's not a dealbreaker.
I came across this tweet from a porn artist. I imagine he gotten enough responses, so I'll keep it anonymous.
"I wish people would stop criticizing porn based on realism We know cervix penetration isn't a thing, we know a belly bulge near the ribcage isn't a thing. We're not trying to give you an anatomy course. It's just exaggeration for the sake of porn. It ain't that deep."
Is that supposed to be relevant? I'd say there's a difference between criticizing intentionally unrealistic anatomy and criticizing bad looking anatomy that takes away from the image. You don't need absolute realism for something to look good, but you can't just use that to deflect all criticism.
It's tagged "bad anatomy", but judging from the upvotes, it's not a dealbreaker.
It doesn't matter if an image is generally popular, either, you can still point out flaws. No one said it was a deal breaker, they were just pointing it out.
I came across this tweet from a porn artist. I imagine he's gotten enough responses, so I'll keep it anonymous.
"I wish people would stop criticizing porn based on realism We know cervix penetration isn't a thing, we know a belly bulge near the ribcage isn't a thing. We're not trying to give you an anatomy course. It's just exaggeration for the sake of porn. It ain't that deep."
It's tagged "bad anatomy", but judging from the upvotes, it's not a dealbreaker.
I think that's just poor excuse, especially when no one is complaining about the sexual exaggeration of the image. Unless someone's got the hots for a Rayman x Kancolle I think it's fair game to say that a floating tiny head is something worth pointing out and be concerned about. Especially if it appears to be a problem for one character in the image only.
Leave a comment