to be perfectly frank, whats wrong if he had said the other? if thats his preference that doesn't make him crazy... whether he's gay, bisexual, or simply into femdom/futa whatever its still pretty rational however you look at it
NarakuniYokoso said: to be perfectly frank, whats wrong if he had said the other? if thats his preference that doesn't make him crazy... whether he's gay, bisexual, or simply into femdom/futa whatever its still pretty rational however you look at it
Well said. I'm glad not everyone are closed-minded and ignorant. Amazing that we live in the 21st century, yet some people are still centuries behind.
Bootyful_Doll said: Well said. I'm glad not everyone are closed-minded and ignorant. Amazing that we live in the 21st century, yet some people are still centuries behind.
not true no one is open-minded. people who claim to be open-minded are always close-minded to whoever they consider close-minded. to be truly open-minded you must accept all opinions no matter how hate filled or how much you disagree.
ramis said: not true no one is open-minded. people who claim to be open-minded are always close-minded to whoever they consider close-minded. to be truly open-minded you must accept all opinions no matter how hate filled or how much you disagree.
Then again, why does one consider open and closed-mindedness as black and white? One doesn't need to be completely/100% open-minded or closed minded. There can be a degree of in between. Compare it to how much you open a door.
ramis said: not true no one is open-minded. people who claim... blah blah blah
You could use a course in philosophy. An open-minded person may reject the opinions of a closed-minded person and still remain open-minded. Why? Because he rejects the arguments of the closed-minded person. It's not that he claims to know everything, but rather, an open-minded person has analyzed his own beliefs quite well using cold logic and has likely found logical fallacies in the arguments of the closed-minded. When they find and use rational arguments, his mind may change.
BakaHoushi said: You could use a course in philosophy. An open-minded person may reject the opinions of a closed-minded person and still remain open-minded. Why? Because he rejects the arguments of the closed-minded person. It's not that he claims to know everything, but rather, an open-minded person has analyzed his own beliefs quite well using cold logic and has likely found logical fallacies in the arguments of the closed-minded. When they find and use rational arguments, his mind may change.
just because my opinion is different then yours doesn't mean i haven't thought about it. as for logic, that doesn't have too much of a place in this. it's either every one should do whatever or there is a set code for conduct. it's just a matter of what they believe. i'm sure you would hate a world where there is no freedom just as i would hate a would with too much freedom. also, i'm not completely closed-minded, i only hate homos, sissy men, and manly women. all there is to it is that you disagree with me and i disagree with you.
It's entirely possible for two open-minded people, using logic, to disagree. Though suggesting the people you listed are inferior, as you may be doing with the word "hate," is clearly NOT thinking at all.
Posting without bumping because "lol, philosophy debate on the Internet"
When homosexual couples outnumber child producing couples a population declines and eventually vanishes outright. Biological fact. Period.
Regarding Hatred.
If you say that you 'don't hate anyone' you are either A, lying to yourself and whomever you speak to, or B, mentally ill. It is perfectly natural to feel some hatred towards other people, whether it be momentary and transient or more deep seated. You will note that I didn't say how MUCH hatred you might feel. It could be a very minor amount. But you still felt it.
Regarding Manly women.
I've had a few experiences with these types. Simply put if you come at me like a man and obviously plan me immediate physical harm, I'm going to knock you on your ass regardless of your gender. Should that be taken to mean I'm going to beat her mercilessly? No. But it should be taken to mean that if you attack me with obvious intentions of physical harm, your gender will afford you absolutely no protection.
Regarding Sissy men.
I've seen what these types do. In my experience their masculinity is completely subjugated and they do things only a woman of the 'bitch' type would normally do. I hate and distrust them and actively seek to keep them as far from me as I possibly can.
Regarding Transexuals.
Because transexuals form a population of assigned-gender: women who do not produce children, if transexuals outnumber child producing women, the population declines and eventually dies outright. Biological Fact. Period.
Regarding the actual art piece.
I don't know about you, but I don't really go for the whole 'penis in my ass' thing. And I'm not going to start. If their change was complete to the point that I couldn't tell the difference, thats one thing. But with a giant obvious penis thats a no-go for me.
Leave a comment