This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days ()

It has been reviewed by 17 approvers. Messages: "AI-assisted. You can see remants of the generated image they colored over in the hands".

Resized to 40% of original (view original)
lillia and petals of spring lillia (league of legends) drawn by paruko_ch

Artist's commentary

  • Original
    •

    新春の花弁リリア

    小鹿可爱捏

  • Comments
    •
    kanase-sakurada
    [hidden]

    konglita said in comment #2638896:

    I don't think this is ai-assisted. The hand-drawn details are super obvious, plus it has line art: https://x.com/ABXYparuko_ch/status/2029774856808714332?s=20
    (I honestly couldn't quite tell where 'colored over in the hands' was supposed to be)

    The "hand-drawn" details are just the artist coloring over a generated image:
    asset #50484728
    asset #50484731
    asset #50484741
    asset #50484742

    The noisy jpeg artifacts of the AI image underneath are visible all throughout the image. The artist didn't fully cover everything up.

    Also, line art/sketches don't prove legitimacy. AI prompters fake WIPs all the time by tracing over an image they generated to pass it off as the "sketch". This is definitely AI-assisted (which isn't against the upload rules or anything)

    Updated by kanase-sakurada

    1 Reply
    konglita
    [hidden]

    kanase-sakurada said in comment #2638957:

    The "hand-drawn" details are just the artist coloring over a generated image:
    asset #50484728
    asset #50484731
    asset #50484741
    asset #50484742

    The noisy jpeg artifacts of the AI image underneath are visible all throughout the image. The artist didn't fully cover everything up.

    Also, line art/sketches don't prove legitimacy. AI prompters fake WIPs all the time by tracing over a image they generated to pass it off as the "sketch". This is definitely AI-assisted (which isn't against the upload rules or anything)

    Thanks for the explanation! I used to think that those blurred areas were just a lazy shortcut by the artist to avoid rendering detail and shading. But after seeing the one asset the ear, I changed my mind—it definitely looks suspicious.

    2 Reply
    kanase-sakurada
    [hidden]

    konglita said in comment #2638961:

    Thanks for the explanation! I used to think that those blurred areas were just a lazy shortcut by the artist to avoid rendering detail and shading. But after seeing the one asset the ear, I changed my mind—it definitely looks suspicious.

    Glad I could help! Also, congrats on the promotion to contributor!

    2 Reply

    Leave a comment