Added an AI gen tag because this is clearly almost entirely done by AI. Her hair changes between the closeup and full body image, the way the stuff is drawn that connects her neck to the post is not only nonsense but also lacks a consistent style, and there's AI gen artifacting in the bottom left of the image.
Added an AI gen tag because this is clearly almost entirely done by AI. Her hair changes between the closeup and full body image, the way the stuff is drawn that connects her neck to the post is not only nonsense but also lacks a consistent style, and there's AI gen artifacting in the bottom left of the image.
Respectfully I'm going to have to disagree. The cords on her neck just seem like they were drawn in a lineless style to save time (certainly not the first time I've seen artists do that for complicated objects like chains). Also, I'm genuinely not sure what the supposed 'AI gen artifacting' on the bottom left is... unless you're talking about the texture overlay near the floor, which is seen on multiple other parts of the artwork and is clearly a stylistic choice. The hair does change on the close-up, but the only main change is the lack of sidelocks, which could reasonably be an artist mistake or even an intentional choice to show off the cross-section better.
Honestly though, the thing that most strikes me as hand-drawn about the image is the lineart and coloring, especially if you look at it in full-res and zoom in. There are multiple parts of the art where the shading overlay bleeds over from one part to another (best example is probably the shoe highlight ending up on the skirt) and many white spots inside the lineart that aren't colored in properly. AI art *can* have messy-looking coloring, but these are not the forms it usually takes and are very human mistakes. Also, at a high resolution like this, you just can't really get this type of crispy textured lineart from AI unless you line over it yourself.
I'm not an expert of course and there could always be a chance it's traced over or referenced from AI, but I really don't think this should warrant the AI-generated tag without further proof, especially since this artist has had a clear style progression over years.
Respectfully I'm going to have to disagree. The cords on her neck just seem like they were drawn in a lineless style to save time (certainly not the first time I've seen artists do that for complicated objects like chains). Also, I'm genuinely not sure what the supposed 'AI gen artifacting' on the bottom left is... unless you're talking about the texture overlay near the floor, which is seen on multiple other parts of the artwork and is clearly a stylistic choice. The hair does change on the close-up, but the only main change is the lack of sidelocks, which could reasonably be an artist mistake or even an intentional choice to show off the cross-section better.
Honestly though, the thing that most strikes me as hand-drawn about the image is the lineart and coloring, especially if you look at it in full-res and zoom in. There are multiple parts of the art where the shading overlay bleeds over from one part to another (best example is probably the shoe highlight ending up on the skirt) and many white spots inside the lineart that aren't colored in properly. AI art *can* have messy-looking coloring, but these are not the forms it usually takes and are very human mistakes. Also, at a high resolution like this, you just can't really get this type of crispy textured lineart from AI unless you line over it yourself.
I'm not an expert of course and there could always be a chance it's traced over or referenced from AI, but I really don't think this should warrant the AI-generated tag without further proof, especially since this artist has had a clear style progression over years.
The stippling in the bottom left where it distorts in the background is typical of AI gen and I can't see why a real artist would replicate that.
And I just find it strange the hair style is inconsistent between the two images. I'm assuming this is ai that's been heavily modified or traced over, which is allowed on danbooru considering there's real artistic effort behind it but looking at some other work by this artist, it's quite inconsistent. That style shift seems more like a style jump.
Tldr: I reckon AI assisted to some degree but the artist has actual talent on their own.
The stippling in the bottom left where it distorts in the background is typical of AI gen and I can't see why a real artist would replicate that.
And I just find it strange the hair style is inconsistent between the two images. I'm assuming this is ai that's been heavily modified or traced over, which is allowed on danbooru considering there's real artistic effort behind it but looking at some other work by this artist, it's quite inconsistent. That style shift seems more like a style jump.
Tldr: I reckon AI assisted to some degree but the artist has actual talent on their own.
Yeah, you will not disrespect dankestofdans calling his work AI.
Note that discussions regarding artist and possible AI use should be placed in topic #22285, both for visibility and searchability instead of the comment section.
This is even more important when it comes to artist with backlogs spanning years. Slapping an AI stamp on them is a decision that shouldn't be taken lightly and needs the feedback of other users.
Leave a comment