Vagina-themed artificial vagina

BUR #60447 has been rejected.

mass update favgroup:56247 -> vagina-themed_artificial_vagina

Most onahole posts don't look like a real pussy

BUR #60448 has been approved by @evazion.

create alias artificial_vagina -> onahole
mass update favgroup:56247 -> pussy_onahole
create alias artificial_ass -> ass_onahole
create alias artificial_vagina_with_body -> body_onahole
create alias used_artificial_vagina -> used_onahole
create alias electric_artificial_vagina -> electric_onahole
create alias broken_artificial_vagina -> broken_onahole
create alias character-themed_artificial_vagina -> character-themed_onahole
create alias unconventional_artificial_vagina -> unconventional_onahole
create alias shared_artificial_vagina -> shared_onahole

Alternative. "Artificial vagina" is a rather long, unwieldy name

BUR #60449 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication onahole_job -> artificial_vagina

Using an onahole on someone requires the presence of an onahole

BUR #60450 has been rejected.

create alias intravaginal_onahole_intercourse -> artificial_vagina_in_pussy
create alias intrarectal_onahole_intercourse -> artificial_vagina_in_ass

Complicated name

BUR #60451 has been approved by @evazion.

create alias intravaginal_onahole_intercourse -> onahole_in_pussy
create alias intrarectal_onahole_intercourse -> onahole_in_ass

Even more simplified

vagina-themed artificial vagina sounds stupid. I never liked the tag for it being artificial vagina even if it's what Wikipedia uses. It feels too clinical and not how people would usually refer to it (which is made even worse by many of them not being designed to replicate vaginas as all, evidently).

Talulah said in forum #442976:

vagina-themed artificial vagina sounds stupid. I never liked the tag for it being artificial vagina even if it's what Wikipedia uses. It feels too clinical and not how people would usually refer to it.

I agree

Agree, I've never liked it either. We're a community of weebs, so the term should be onahole.

The bulk update request #60449 (forum #442973) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #60451 (forum #442975) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #60450 (forum #442974) has been rejected by @evazion.

The bulk update request #60448 (forum #442972) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #60447 (forum #442971) has been rejected by @evazion.

BUR #65129 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication character-themed_onahole -> onahole

while (or rather where) we're on the subject.

you could argue that some of the posts tagged character-themed onahole aren't actually onaholes, but that's another issue

The bulk update request #65129 (forum #462724) has been approved by @evazion.

BUR #65784 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication electric_onahole -> onahole
create implication pussy_onahole -> onahole
create implication used_onahole -> onahole
create implication ass_onahole -> onahole
create implication body_onahole -> onahole

Type

The bulk update request #65784 (forum #465024) has been approved by @evazion.

BUR #65903 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication shared_onahole -> onahole

Action

BUR #65904 has been rejected.

create implication shared_onahole -> onahole_job

Alternative

てはいさ said in forum #465385:

BUR #65904 has been rejected.

create implication shared_onahole -> onahole_job

Alternative

I don't think shared onahole entirely mimics what an onahole job is which is someone actively holding the onahole (the three examples being hand, feet or boobs).

post #4161388 This you could consider a handjob and so onahole handjob, but this post #4469341 is just two penises together. Then the situations where post #3685935 the point is they're mutually thrusting into it. Yeah it's using an onahole "on" another person, but I don't think it's in the spirit of what an onahole job should be.