I'm sure that no approver will look at a 1280x720 animation that perfectly recreates the Hol Horse and Boingo special ending created over 3-5 weeks with "Poor Quality". They may skip it but I can't imagine that any approver we have here would be so arrogant to label such hard work as poor quality. Well how about that, the very first one did it. I swear I will never understand what constitutes "Danbooru quality" if something like this that is essentially redrawing each frame of a 1 minute and 31 second official animation is "poor quality" then I will never understand what is good quality.
I'm sure that no approver will look at a 1280x720 animation that perfectly recreates the Hol Horse and Boingo special ending created over 3-5 weeks with "Poor Quality". They may skip it but I can't imagine that any approver we have here would be so arrogant to label such hard work as poor quality. Well how about that, the very first one did it. I swear I will never understand what constitutes "Danbooru quality" if something like this that is essentially redrawing each frame of a 1 minute and 31 second official animation is "poor quality" then I will never understand what is good quality.
I think that it's just that they dont like the artstyle
I'm sure that no approver will look at a 1280x720 animation that perfectly recreates the Hol Horse and Boingo special ending created over 3-5 weeks with "Poor Quality". They may skip it but I can't imagine that any approver we have here would be so arrogant to label such hard work as poor quality. Well how about that, the very first one did it. I swear I will never understand what constitutes "Danbooru quality" if something like this that is essentially redrawing each frame of a 1 minute and 31 second official animation is "poor quality" then I will never understand what is good quality.
Approvers judge based on results, not effort (assuming no A.I. is used, of course). Spending a lot of time on a work doesn't guarantee it will look appealing, especially to an audience biased towards more conventional anime styles.
I don't have any issues with the post (especially since it's a parody and made to look that way on purpose), but
Approvers judge based on results, not effort (assuming no A.I. is used, of course). Spending a lot of time on a work doesn't guarantee it will look appealing, especially to an audience biased towards more conventional anime styles.
I fully understand that, it's just I personally find anyone labeling such work to mimic a celebrated Mangaka's (other) art style by reproducing it frame by frame by saying it's "poor quality" to be extremely arrogant and rude to the point of feeling like I'm being gaslit on what constitutes "Danbooru quality". Especially when I see some of the stuff that has been approved. At the end of the day I suppose this is me just venting. My apologies.
Regarding the tags: The artist has explicitly referred to this character(Hysteric Jade) as a "boy" multipletimesandhas also used the "femboy" tag when posting artwork of him on pixiv. (He's also been described as "male" in the title of a pixiv post) You can also see the artist using he/himpronounsfor the character in a recent tweet. Please refrain from changing the tag to "girl."
Regarding the tags: The artist has explicitly referred to this character(Hysteric Jade) as a "boy" multipletimesandhas also used the "femboy" tag when posting artwork of him on pixiv. (He's also been described as "male" in the title of a pixiv post) You can also see the artist using he/himpronounsfor the character in a recent tweet. Please refrain from changing the tag to "girl."
@shshkkjtn Please use the No Bump option if you're going to comment the same thing on multiple posts within a short time period.
Leave a comment