Comments

[hidden]

Giulio64 said:

Almost seemed like a Khyle. post, but I can't see anything noteworthy? Like, what's the joke here anyways?

One can is already missing from the set of 6.
Shinji's still underage to get his license but Misato praises him for his driving skills.
So Misato drank while driving and literally handed Shinji the wheel.
Or maybe there's some other things happening behind the wheels...that ripped off corner of something sure looks like a condom wrapper from size comparison with the things inside the plastic bag.

[hidden]

Rathurue said in comment #2530439:

One can is already missing from the set of 6.
Shinji's still underage to get his license but Misato praises him for his driving skills.
So Misato drank while driving and literally handed Shinji the wheel.
Or maybe there's some other things happening behind the wheels...that ripped off corner of something sure looks like a condom wrapper from size comparison with the things inside the plastic bag.

Misato humped him while he drives

[hidden]

Alanis_the_Evoker said in comment #2630986:

I think Charlie here was complaining more about the "ai slop" dimension here. Speaking of, a reminder that purely AI-generated posts are against the upload rules.

We're all tired of AI slop, but that doesn't justify calling the uploader a "gooner retard" over what was most certainly an accident.

There's a big difference between a regular contributor accidentally uploading AI-gens here and there, and a brand-new user filling their 5 post slots with slop they pumped out in Gemini minutes before creating their throwaway account.

[hidden]

jimgig said in comment #2630634:

That's rich coming from the community whose jannies decreed truckers weren't working class and banned all who disagreed.

Truckers who own and operate their own trucks aren't workers by a Marxist definition as they own their own means of production. Regular truckers who work for a company absolutely are.

[hidden]

kingaska12 said in comment #2630987:

Truckers who own and operate their own trucks aren't workers by a Marxist definition as they own their own means of production. Regular truckers who work for a company absolutely are.

If your intellectual framework declares that truckers are not working class, your framework does not match the world it claims to model. Truckers are obviously working class in every fibre of their being to anyone who interacts with them. Excluding them is such an obvious dysjunct that doubling down calls into question whether the community's definition of working class exists to describe the world at all, or if it exists to support a mental system.

[hidden]

jimgig said in comment #2631023:

Excluding them is such an obvious dysjunct that doubling down calls into question whether the community's definition of working class exists to describe the world at all, or if it exists to support a mental system.

Don't know what system that would be, but this certainly underscores how outdated the definition is for practical and political purposes.

[hidden]

jimgig said in comment #2631023:

If your intellectual framework declares that truckers are not working class, your framework does not match the world it claims to model. Truckers are obviously working class in every fibre of their being to anyone who interacts with them. Excluding them is such an obvious dysjunct that doubling down calls into question whether the community's definition of working class exists to describe the world at all, or if it exists to support a mental system.

You misunderstand. I agree it's outdated. But, at no point did I say all truckers. Just owner/operators who ,by technicality, count as petite bourgeoisie. It is a testament to how capitalism is degrading that they have similar living conditions of the proletariat. Any truckers who works for a company or otherwise drives someone else's truck for a living is working class. Their is nuance and not all Marxist forget this. It would be wise for you not do so as well.

Updated by kingaska12

[hidden]

Car is based on the V35 generation (2001-2007) of the Nissan Skyline coupe. The rear window has the same shape and only the coupe had one-piece tail lights.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Skyline#Eleventh_generation_(V35;_2001)

EDIT: I do see that the Infiniti G35 was tagged in the previous version of this image, but they are both essentially the same minus the luxury branding, features, and coming as a LHD for the G35 (at least in those markets). I do think Infiniti vehicles were offered in RHD markets (Australia, New Zealand, the UK, etc) at this time, so a RHD G35 could be possible.